A crowd gathers at the Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center in Hawley, Pa, for a meeting of the Regulated Flow Advisory Committee of the Delaware River Basin Commission. PHOTo by Meg McGuire
No news is not always good news
The four states — and New York City — with interest in the the Delaware River have not yet come to any agreement about changes to how those waters are apportioned. New Jersey wants more water, especially during droughts. In order for it to get more, more water has to be released from the three New York City reservoirs that feed into the Delaware. And even if New York City were to agree, a change would still need the other states' approval.
That's a fundamental change — and New Jersey isn't interested in making smaller adjustments to suit various problems (flood mitigation, improving fishery habitats) until there's a major overhaul.
That's not what a crowd of about a hundred wanted to hear at the Regulated Flow Advisory Committee meeting (one of the advisory committees of the Delaware River Basin Commission) held on Tuesday.
Many of the people who spoke at the meeting complimented both the committee and the DRBC for holding the meeting in Hawley, Pa. rather than the usual meeting place in Trenton N.J., therefore making it easier for people from the Upper Delaware to come.
And in a departure from usual practice, four of the five decree party principals (the four states and New York City) were also on hand to hear from concerned citizens: Pennsylvania's Kelly Heffner, New Jersey's Dan Kennedy, Delaware's David Wunsch, New York City's City's Paul Rush. New York state's representative wasn't able to make it.
In their presentations, the speakers asked for small modifications to present practice. Some spoke about keeping space in the reservoirs to allow the reservoirs to hold water during repeated heavy rains. Diane Tharp, executive director of the North Delaware River Watershed Conservancy, said that If that practice were in place some of the devastation suffered from the floods of 2004, 2005, and 2006 could have been prevented. Dr. Gregory Stokes, mayor of Riegelsville, Pa., said he understood about the need to keep a balance in the Delaware between flood and drought, but his town has suffered from flooding and it hurts the community for years to come.
Many spoke about the need to protect the cold-water fishing that could thrive with steady, predictable cold-water releases from the reservoirs. Those same releases would benefit the various canoe and kayak services in the river. And those improvements could boost tourism and therefore boost local economies.
"You have the ability to kill this industry (river-based businesses) or make it better," said David Jones, co-owner of Kittatinny Canoes based in the Upper Delaware.
None of that will happen, at least not yet.
There is a one bit of, well, not bad news: The current system of regulating the flow, called the Flexible Flow Management Plan, will once again be renewed by May 31st, according to the Delaware River Master George Mason, who said that the decree parties (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and New York City) are close to an agreement to re-up the FFMP and continue it as is.
Four of the five decree party principals listen to comments reflecting varied interests in the Delaware River. From left, David Wunsch, director of the Delaware Geological Survey; Dan Kennedy, assistant commissioner for water resources, for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Paul Rush, deputy commissioner of New York City's Bureau of Water Supply; and Kelly Heffner, deputy secretary for water management, for Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection. PHOTo by Meg McGuire
"If only people realized that they were not the most important creatures living on the Earth, I think the world would be a much better place." – Rebecca Pisall
Her death started a movement. Click here to learn more.
© 2017 Delaware Currents | PO Box 306 | Port Jervis, New York 12771